Comments on: SHOULD SMOKING POT BE A PROTECTED RIGHT?

By: ReaganGirl

ReaganGirl — Sun, 28 Oct 2012 02:33:35 +0000

Thanks Jerry. That’s the real world perspective on this pot issue. It’s implications are immense. When lives are endangered and the well-being of the civil society suffers because some believe their “right” to get stoned should be ensconced in law, then the rights of the rest of us are diminished.

By: Jerry Hunsinger

Jerry Hunsinger — Sun, 28 Oct 2012 00:26:14 +0000

David, my friend, you are wrong in this crusade that you are on. I think deep down you know that you are.

Your friend,
Jerry the Hun

By: Jerry Hunsinger

Jerry Hunsinger — Sun, 28 Oct 2012 00:23:48 +0000

Marjorie, thank you for what you do. To me you are like Joan of Arc. Please know that I will always have your six, so long as I have life and the ability to be proactive in your behalf.

Jerry

By: Jerry Hunsinger

Jerry Hunsinger — Sun, 28 Oct 2012 00:20:41 +0000

I was an airline pilot for 32-years. I have been pulled out of the cockpit many times and tested on the spot. Had I failed any test I would have been fired on the spot – that is as it should be. Nobody should be allowed to use marijuana, it has no redeeming features at all, rather it is a crutch for people without the strength of will and purpose to face life as it comes. I already voted NO on 64, and I am proud that I did.

By: ReaganGirl

ReaganGirl — Fri, 26 Oct 2012 22:12:38 +0000

Bad consequences are rarely intended, but eventually reality catches up with the unicorns and glitter. No need to yell. You will never convince me that you’re right on this.

By: David Cox

David Cox — Fri, 26 Oct 2012 20:25:27 +0000

(6) Employers, driving, minors and control of property.
(a) NOTHING IN THIS SECTION IS INTENDED TO REQUIRE AN EMPLOYER TO PERMIT OR ACCOMMODATE THE USE, CONSUMPTION, POSSESSION, TRANSFER, DISPLAY, TRANSPORTATION, SALE OR GROWING OF MARIJUANA IN THE WORKPLACE OR TO AFFECT THE ABILITY OF EMPLOYERS TO HAVE POLICIES RESTRICTING THE USE OF MARIJUANA BY EMPLOYEES.
(b) NOTHING IN THIS SECTION IS INTENDED TO ALLOW DRIVING UNDER THE INFLUENCE OF MARIJUANA OR DRIVING WHILE IMPAIRED BY MARIJUANA OR TO SUPERSEDE STATUTORY LAWS RELATED TO DRIVING UNDER THE INFLUENCE OF MARIJUANA OR DRIVING WHILE IMPAIRED BY MARIJUANA, NOR SHALL THIS SECTION PREVENT THE STATE FROM ENACTING AND IMPOSING PENALTIES FOR DRIVING UNDER THE INFLUENCE OF OR WHILE IMPAIRED BY MARIJUANA.
(c) NOTHING IN THIS SECTION IS INTENDED TO PERMIT THE TRANSFER OF MARIJUANA, WITH OR WITHOUT REMUNERATION, TO A PERSON UNDER THE AGE OF TWENTY-ONE OR TO ALLOW A PERSON UNDER THE AGE OF TWENTY-ONE TO PURCHASE, POSSESS, USE, TRANSPORT, GROW, OR CONSUME MARIJUANA.