The Monster that Ate Education

April 12, 2014

We should all be alarmed by the extent to which roles of parents and families have been relinquished to government. As Ronald Reagan once said, “As government grows, liberty contracts.” What should be the administration of academic learning and a few basic social skills has grown into a monstrous dependence on government to meet the needs of children, from food, to shelter, to moral instruction. To paraphrase Ronald Reagan, “As dependency on the public school system grows, the American family contracts.”


The following is the aggregate list of services offered, decade by decade, by America’s public schools. Jamie Vollmer, a teacher, consultant, and public education advocate, compiled this list as evidence for his argument that public schools need and are worthy of ever increasing levels of funding. Although I am using Vollmer’s list in it’s original form, my purpose in using it is not to support the growth of government-run education, but instead to reveal how many parental responsibilities have been taken up by public schools.

It’s alarming  to see the the extent to which roles of parents and families have been relinquished to a government entity. As Ronald Reagan once said, “As government grows, liberty contracts.” What should be the administration of academic learning and a few basic social skills has grown into a monstrous dependence on government to increasingly meet the needs of children from food, to shelter, to moral instruction. To paraphrase Ronald Reagan, “As dependency on the public school system grows, the American family contracts.”

Vollmer’s List

From 1900 to 1910, we shifted to the school responsibilities related to:.

  • Nutrition
  • Immunization
  • Health (Activities in the health arena multiply every year.)

From 1910 to 1930, we added:.

  • Physical education (including organized athletics)
  • The Practical Arts/Domestic Science/Home economics (including sewing and cooking)
  • Vocational education (including industrial and agricultural education)
  • Mandated school transportation

In the 1940s, we added:.

  • Business education (including typing, shorthand, and bookkeeping)
  • Art and music
  • Speech and drama
  • Half-day kindergarten
  • School lunch programs (We take this for granted today, but it was a huge step to shift to the schools the job of feeding America’s children one third of their daily meals.)

In the 1950s, we added:.

  • Expanded science and math education
  • Safety education
  • Driver’s education
  • Expanded music and art education
  • Stronger foreign language requirements
  • Sex education (Topics continue to escalate.)

In the 1960s, we added:.

  • Advanced Placement programs
  • Head Start
  • Title I
  • Adult education
  • Consumer education (purchasing resources, rights and responsibilities)
  • Career education (occupational options, entry level skill requirements)
  • Peace, leisure, and recreation education [Loved those sixties.]

In the 1970s, the breakup of the American family accelerated,
and we added:.

  • Drug and alcohol abuse education
  • Parenting education (techniques and tools for healthy parenting)
  • Behavior adjustment classes (including classroom and communication skills)
  • Character education
  • Special education (mandated by federal government)
  • Title IX programs (greatly expanded athletic programs for girls)
  • Environmental education
  • Women’s studies
  • African-American heritage education
  • School breakfast programs (Now some schools feed America’s children two-thirds of their daily meals throughout the school year and all summer. Sadly, these are the only decent meals some children receive.)

In the 1980s, the floodgates opened, and we added:.

  • Keyboarding and computer education
  • Global education
  • Multicultural/Ethnic education
  • Nonsexist education
  • English-as-a-second-language and bilingual education
  • Teen pregnancy awareness
  • Hispanic heritage education
  • Early childhood education
  • Jump Start, Early Start, Even Start, and Prime Start
  • Full-day kindergarten
  • Preschool programs for children at risk
  • After-school programs for children of working parents
  • Alternative education in all its forms
  • Stranger/danger education
  • Antismoking education
  • Sexual abuse prevention education
  • Expanded health and psychological services
  • Child abuse monitoring (a legal requirement for all teachers)

In the 1990s, we added:.

  • Conflict resolution and peer mediation
  • HIV/AIDS education
  • CPR training
  • Death education
  • America 2000 initiatives (Republican)
  • Inclusion
  • Expanded computer and internet education
  • Distance learning
  • Tech Prep and School to Work programs
  • Technical Adequacy
  • Assessment
  • Post-secondary enrollment options
  • Concurrent enrollment options
  • Goals 2000 initiatives (Democratic)
  • Expanded Talented and Gifted opportunities
  • At risk and dropout prevention
  • Homeless education (including causes and effects on children)
  • Gang education (urban centers)
  • Service learning
  • Bus safety, bicycle safety, gun safety, and water safety education

In the first decade of the twenty-first century, we added:.

  • No Child Left Behind (Republican)
  • Bully prevention
  • Anti-harassment policies (gender, race, religion, or national origin)
  • Expanded early childcare and wrap around programs
  • Elevator and escalator safety instruction
  • Body Mass Index evaluation (obesity monitoring)
  • Organ donor education and awareness programs
  • Personal financial literacy
  • Entrepreneurial and innovation skills development
  • Media literacy development
  • Contextual learning skill development
  • Health and wellness programs
  • Race to the Top (Democratic)

Please visit JamieVollmer.com to read more about him and his list. 

Posted by Marjorie Haun  4/12/14


7 Big Reasons Why Obama, and Other Dictators, Embrace Chaos

April 11, 2014

“We must not look to government to solve our problems. Government is the problem. ~Ronald Reagan~


The failure of the Obamacare roll-out is not a debacle, it’s both part of a long-term plan and a reflection of progressive ideology. The Obama regime is the epitome of the unprincipled enacting, with uncanny precision, a set of principles which deny human nature and defy the rule of law. This operational style employing the crisis du jour, disorder in the courts, and the rule of the lawless is somewhat new to America, but then Obama is America’s very first unabashed dictator…and chaos is his friend.

Remember Occupy Wall Street, and the fawning treatment the movement received from Obama, uber-leftists and little dictators like Nancy Pelosi? The chaos initiated in New York which spread to cities throughout the fruited plain jeopardized the foundations of Capitalism, and presented an opportunity to impose a Socialist Police State should the delicious chaos become unmanageable. Fortunately, the coddled trust-funders behind the movement got tired of living in squalor and started missing their x-box games and went home to their parents’ basements after a couple of months to resume living the horrors of the American Dream. The Occupy Movement was dictator-endorsed chaos.

Every policy put forth by the Obama Administration wreaks havoc with the natural order of civil society, from homosexual marriage to amnesty for uncounted millions of illegal aliens, pitting ethnic groups and socioeconomic classes of people against one another. Obama’s progress is a retrogression of Constitutional law. Obama, and other dictators, succeed when civility fails.

Here are 7 reasons why Obama, and other dictators, embrace chaos:

1. More chaos leads to less individual freedom:

When upheaval occurs within the economy, job market, education and all areas affected by contrived crises arising from bad policy, fear-mongering, or political maneuvering outside constitutional limits, citizens are beset with uncertainty and fear. Like a wet blanket on the torch of freedom, the pall of chaos breeds mistrust of government at all levels, and between groups of people who ordinarily get along just fine. Mistrust, fear, and uncertainty are instinctive restraints on human creativity, innovation and risk, the very components that make free-markets vibrant.  The Obama-ordered IRS attack on the Tea Party and other outspoken groups illustrates how the dictatorial state becomes a threat to privacy, associations, and free movement. Citizens, in their paranoia, become less assertive with opinions and actions for fear of government reprisal. “When governments fear the people, there is liberty…when the people fear the government, there is tyranny.”~Thomas Jefferson.

2. As individual morality shrinks, the government of necessity must grow:

The misapplication of law or government resources, and judicial revision are tactics universally embraced by socialist regimes. Dictators seek to exert control by using the power of the state to extinguish opposition, and to enact agendas through extra-legislative means. This generates two dynamics which damage the moral climate of society.

First, laws passed, to satisfy social trends or special interest groups, which defy the traditions and character of society;  abortion-on-demand and homosexual marriage for example, create confusion about what is right and acceptable, especially in the minds of young people. The law should reflect the Judeo-Christian values that helped Western Civilization flourish and conceive the kind of government that places the individual above the state. Yet, when immoral principles which foster social evils are enacted into law, clarity is lost about where moral authority is to be found, and whether or not legality and morality are equivalent.

Second, immoral behavior: sloth, sexual vices, self-destructive addictions, etc., undercut an individual’s personal freedom as well as his ability to remain self-sufficient. As entire populations are thrown into moral and personal chaos by the propagation of legalized sin, government welfare becomes a desperate resource for people who have lost the sense of accountability as well as ability to judge, or even care, what is good or bad for them. “Man’s laws cannot make moral that which God’s law has declared immoral.” ~M. Russell Ballard

3. Chaos can be blamed on the traditional economic system, and the politicians and policies that preceded the dictatorial regime:

Obama has refined the art of blame shifting as no other president in our history. He is living proof that using chaotic events to bludgeon political opponents, past, present, and future, is not merely never letting a good crisis go to waste, but rather an intentional practice used to foment economic, social, and political instability. Chaos does not just happen as a matter of fate. Dictatorial regimes prepare for it, create it, and use “we inherited this mess” rhetoric to shield themselves from culpability, even years and decades into failure and chaos that they, themselves created.

In the American setting, where free-market Capitalism is the prevailing economic model, chaos incited by a bad socialist policies can be blamed on the system itself. Obama, injecting wildly progressive economic policies, crony capitalism, insanely reckless government spending, and extreme social experimentation has, with the support of a sycophantic press corps, successfully blamed Capitalism and its conservative sponsors for the ensuing meltdowns. When dictators can pin blame for failed socialist policies on free markets, citizens will gradually accept the falsehoods as truth. “After [Republicans] drove the car in the ditch, made it as difficult as possible for us to pull it back, now they want the keys back. No. They can’t drive. We don’t want to have to go back in the ditch.” ~Barack Obama

4. Chaos results in a crisis of faith for many citizens, who then supplant the providence of God with the power of the state:

Socialism, in its many forms, in incompatible with an authentically pious society. In other words, a powerful centralized state cannot coexist with God. Social, economic, and personal chaos can bring great adversity to the lives of citizens, who may come to question why God would allow such hardships to befall them. Dictators prey upon the spiritually vulnerable who find themselves wanting for employment, food, housing, and even hope. Remember Obama’s Hope and Change? All totalitarian philosophies, with the exception of Islam, must in effect destroy God and ban religion so the people, of necessity, seek for answers to all life’s questions from the government. Atheism, as a movement, has snowballed during Obama’s term, along with legal and actual assaults on Christians and Jews of all stripes. God and church-going citizens are threats to government, and chaos is a threat to civil order and peaceful, freedom of worship. With the loss of religious practice and sentiment in society, people, who are spiritual in nature, may replace the adoration of God with the deification of celebrities and politicians who appear to to satisfy all temporal and theological voids. “The abolition of religion as the illusory happiness of the people is the demand for their real happiness.” ~Karl Marx

5. The “survival” mindset citizens take up during times of crisis and chaos place physical needs over intellectual and spiritual considerations, resulting in a “dumbed-down,” more dependent citizenry:

Government-provided security becomes very appealing when economic chaos impacts one’s ability to provide for himself and his family. Citizens become inured to the shame of being on the dole, but even more devastating is the development of a “what’s in it for me” mentality. With these dynamics comes a shift in priorities. Where hopeful and prosperous citizens seek education, refinement, artistic excellence, and intellectual fulfillment, desperately dependent people become occupied with ensuring they have enough money and food just to make it to the next pay period. Groups of people who become chronically dependent on government due to social chaos within their communities and generational poverty, are less educated, less healthy, and less able to break out of the cycle of dependence because they lack inventiveness and flexibility of thought. Dictators prey upon these dynamics because it provides a dependable pool of supporters–voters–who willingly advance the political party which promises to provide for them what they cannot provide for themselves. Dictators foster the perverse sense in government dependents that the earners, from whom money is taken to support them, are being “punished” for “having more.” Such absurdities become conventional wisdom in ovine cultures where independent thought is discouraged, and even penalized. “Never underestimate the power of stupid people in large groups.” ~George Carlin

6. Social chaos, conflict, economic disaster, and moral breakdown lead to increased violence within some communities. Dictators will always use this dynamic as a justification for disarming all citizens, including the law-abiding:

Dictators are restrained by citizens possessing the ability to secure their own rights through force. Americans are uniquely blessed with the right to keep and bear arms for personal defense, and millions do so, lawfully. Armed citizens are the last barrier to complete totalitarianism. But even in our constitutional republic, attempts to subvert the 2nd Amendment through gun-control legislation and pressure from the Left, are endless. Obama relishes the violent chaos instigated by madmen with guns. Every instance of gun violence during the Obama presidency has been pounced on by the socialists, like vultures on a swollen carcass, as on opportunity to disarm Americans. The goal of dictators is complete disarmament, and with increasingly extreme cases of gun violence–such as that which took the lives of dozens at an elementary school in Connecticut last year–assaults on the 2nd Amendment have become more intense. Fortunately, the 2nd Amendment and the American ethos of self-defense against criminals as well as tyrants, have withstood attempts by our homegrown dictators to abolish the One Right which secures them all. “The very atmosphere of firearms anywhere and everywhere restrains evil interference – they deserve a place of honor with all that’s good” ~George Washington

7. Chaos within society, and within the government itself,  provides a distraction from the corrupt, wasteful, and unjust practices of dictatorial regimes:

Obama is the master of chaos. It is intentional, and for all of the reasons mentioned in this article, it is an operational style favored by politicians with dictatorial impulses. But there is no idealism behind Obama’s dictatorial impulses, such as the desire to mandate a perfectly just society through controlling human behavior, or using law to ensure economic and social equality for all. Chaos is Obama’s scrim which hides appalling crony capitalism,  funneling of taxpayer money to donors and supporters through sham corporations–such as the green energy scam –miserable incompetence and hair-raising social agendas. Obama, like other dictators, embraces revenge politics. The media-inspired Trayvon Martin chaos gave Obama and other agitators within the black community a platform to demonize whites, the 2nd Amendment, the State of Florida, and “stand-your-ground” laws. But behind the histrionics exists a vengeful endorsement by the President of the United States of black on white crime, which in many cases is glossed-over by an emasculated press. The government shutdown which, according to hysterics in the media, portended the apocalypse, was cover for and distraction from the intentionally disastrous kickoff of Obamacare. Obama the Dictator knew it would fail, but its failure would be less negative for his image if it came on the heels of the “Republican assault” on all that is good and holy in the federal government. He may have overplayed the distraction card with Obamacare, but the expertise with which Obama has used chaos to misdirect public attention from his personal and political corruption, failed policies, dirty deals, and chronic abrogation of the Constitution, has, until now, given the most incompetent, unscrupulous, opaque, and un-American president in American history the reputation of being politically unassailable. “The true essence of a dictatorship is in fact not its regularity but its unpredictability and caprice…” ~Christopher Hitchens

by Marjorie Haun 4/11/14


Colorado Democrats’ Hypocrisy on “Paycheck Equality”

This article contributed by Revealing Politics was published on ColoradoWatchDog.org on April 9, and posted with permission by Reagangirl.com April 10, 2014.

Equal pay is great, until it applies to Colorado Democrats


By Revealing Politics    posted April 9, 2014

For “Equal Pay Day,” Colorado Democrats in the Legislature offered up a joint resolution to support equal pay for equal work. Republicans in the Colorado Senate supported the idea, so much so, that they offered an amendment to resolve two offices held by top elected officials should offer equal pay for equal work as well: the White House and that of U.S. Sen. Mark Udall.

This amendment derailed the resolution and the majority party decided to postpone a decision. See the video:

This article contributed by Revealing Politics was published on ColoradoWatchDog.org on April 9, and posted with permission by Reagangirl.com April 10, 2014.


Sarge on Democrats, Exploitation, and Obama-era “Newspeak”

April 8, 2014

“Like buzzards on carrion, Democrats swarm mass tragedies which occur outside of human control and exploit them as justification for creating bad policies which, in turn, lead to human-caused mass tragedies.” ~Reagangirl



Well, once again we see the Democrats following one of their prime directives; i.e. never let a good crisis go to waste. Bodies were still being wheeled into surgery at Fort Hood when Democrat politicians and talking heads in the media started their clarion call for gun control. These people are despicable, and use everything from tragedies to funerals to promote their party line.

Obama, while making a series of cliched speeches oriented towards the low-information types, alleged that Republicans want to take away everyone’s health insurance. Mr President, no one has taken more health insurance policies away from the American people than you have! Since the implementation of Obamacare, over seven million policies have been cancelled, many of them being family policies, as insurance companies struggle to adapt to your “one size fits all” insurance requirements. You falsely claim that seven million people are now signed up for Obamacare, but you fail to mention that more than ten million are now uninsured because of your brutal health care law. That sounds like a three million person loss overall, if I remember my high school math rightly.

Certainly we are now firmly in the era of the “Newspeak” that George Orwell predicted.

  • Premiums are going up and up, but Obama says they are going down.
  • 7.5 million signups were expected by Democrats by the end of November, but we are being told that that the seven million signups allegedly recorded on 1 April have met the stated goal.
  • The economy sucks, but we are being told by Obama and his party that it is booming, partly because of Obamacare.
  • Pelosi tells us Obamacare will create jobs, but the nation is still losing jobs, and the mandates for business haven’t even clicked in yet.
  • Obama drones are being told things other than the reality, and they are cheering like good little Germans at Nuremberg in 1932.
  • Most absurd of all, Obama has implied that getting health care coverage gives a person dignity and self worth.

Mr President, those values come from a much higher authority than yours, sir! An authority that you do not truly accept, since you know of nothing higher than yourself. You incessantly push forward enslavement  of the people by the state, and you disregard the Constitution and the holy principles that this country was founded on. So do not belittle that which instills dignity and hope into the thinking individual!

Go with God, my valued brothers and sisters, and remember that nothing can silence the real Master, the true source of hope and dignity in the universe.

- The Sarge

Old Sarge, Forrest L. Gomez, is a Vietnam veteran, patriot, author and friend to Reagangirl.com. This post was published with permission on 4/8/14


After 50 Years, Vietnam Veterans Get the Thanks They Deserve

April 8, 2014

Written and originally posted by the staff at TheVeteransSite.com

The Homecoming They Never Had

This is a sad but true story of a Kentucky base that was socially ostracized on their trip back home from Vietnam War. In fact, it was once said that “at no point in our country’s history have our veterans been hurt more by our own countrymen than by the enemy.”

Watch as they finally get the homecoming they deserved so many years ago!

As seen on TheVeteransSite.com , originally posted one year ago.

Reposted by Reagangirl.com 4/8/14



Confirmed: Russia is Building its Nuclear Arsenal

April 7, 2014

This article was originally published by Zbigniew Mazurak and subsequently posted on Reagangirl.com, April 7, 2014.

Strategic Command and State Department confirm: Russia is building UP its nuclear arsenal


For many years, this writer has been warning against any reductions in the US nuclear arsenal, based on the fact that Russia was building up its own, China’s nuclear arsenal’s size was unknown and likely to be in the thousands of warheads, and North Korea’s nuclear capabilities were steadily increasing.

Accordingly, this writer has always consistently opposed any cuts in the US nuclear arsenal, including those mandated by the New START treaty, and has argued vocally against proposals by Obama admin officials and non-governmental arms control advocates like the “Arms Control Association” to cut the nuclear deterrent even further.

As time passed, more and more evidence emerged proving this writer’s claims – and proving nuclear disarmament advocates wrong.

But last Wednesday, the most powerful piece of evidence arrived: State Department cables from Moscow and Congressional testimony by Adm. Cecil Haney, commander of the Strategic Command, in charge of America’s entire nuclear commander.

According to US State Department diplomats in Moscow, who monitor Russia daily, Moscow is “vastly increasing” its nuclear arsenal and aims to reach “nuclear superiority over, not nuclear parity with, the US”, as Bill Gertz reports in his newest column in the Washington Free Beacon.

This is consistent with previous media and think-tank reports that Russia was building up its nuclear arsenal, was building additional strategic Tu-160 bombers, and had ordered 400 new ICBMs. The State Department and Bill Gertz have now simply confirmed this.

Thus, we have irrefutable evidence that a) Russia is dramatically increasing its nuclear arsenal, and b) its buildup is aimed at achieving nuclear superiority over, not parity with, the US. Which also proves that  New START is a treasonous treaty highly dangerous to US and allied security, because it requires nuclear arsenal cuts only of the US, while allowing Russia to dramatically increase its own arsenal.

Russia currently has:

  • About 414-434 ICBMs capable of delivering at least 1,684 (and probably more) nuclear warheads to the CONUS, with its fleet of 68-75 SS-18 Satan ICBMs alone being able to deliver 10 warheads each (750 in total);
  • 13 ballistic missile submarines, each armed with 16 ballistic missiles (20 in the case of the sole Typhoon class boat), each missile being itself capable of delivering 4-8 warheads (12 in the future, when Bulava and Liner missiles replace the currently-used Skiff) to the CONUS even if launched from Russian ports (Moscow has had such long-ranged missiles since the late 1980s), meaning over 1,400 warheads in total deliverable by Russia’s strategic submarine fleet;
  • 251 strategic bombers (Tu-95, Tu-160, Tu-22M), each capable of delivering between 7 (Tu-95) and 12 (Tu-22M) nuclear warheads to the CONUS. Russian bombers have, in recent years, repeatedly flown close to, and sometimes into, US airspace.
  • 2,800 strategic nuclear warheads in total, of which 1,500 are now deployed – and more will be deployed in the future – on the forementioned ICBMs, submarines, and bombers.
  • Over 20 attack and cruise missile submarines, each carrying nuclear-armed cruise missiles (one such submarine of the Akula class popped up last year near the US submarine base at King’s Bay, GA).
  • The world’s largest tactical nuclear arsenal, with around 4,000 warheads deliverable by a very wide range of systems, from short-range ballistic missiles to artillery pieces to tactical aircraft (Su-24, Su-25, the Flanker family, Su-34), to surface ships using nuclear depth charges.
  • Illegal (banned by the INF Treaty) intermediate-range nuclear-armed missiles (Yars-M, R-500, Iskander-M) that can target any place in Europe and China. (Nonetheless, despite these facts, the Obama administration and NATO are too afraid to recognize and name Russia as an INF Treaty violator.)

Russia is now dramatically increasing that arsenal, as the State Department and the Strategic Command’s leader have now confirmed. In addition to deploying more warheads and building more bombers from stockpiled components, it is:

  • Deploying new submarine-launched ballistic missiles (the Bulava and the Liner) that can carry 10-12 warheads each. Russia plans to procure around 140-150 missiles of each type; when these are fully deployed on Russia’s 13 ballistic missile subs, that fleet will be able to carry 2,000-2,200 nuclear warheads all by itself.
  • Deploying additional Yars-M, R-500, and Iskander-M IRBMs – in violation of the INF Treaty.

Russia is also steadily modernizing its existing nuclear arsenal and fleet of delivery systems. It is:

  • Developing and deploying a new class of ballistic missile submarines capable of carrying missiles such as the Bulava and the Liner. Two of them have already been commissioned and at least eight in total will be built.
  • Developing a next-generation intercontinental bomber, slated to first fly in 2020 – before the USAF’s planned Long Range Strike Bomber will.
  • Developing a new submarine-launched cruise missile, the Kaliber;
  • Procuring and deploying a new air-launched cruise missile, the Kh-101/102;
  • Developing and deploying three new ICBM types – the light Yars (RS-24, SS-29) to replace the single-warhead Topol and Topol-M missiles, the midweight Avangard/Rubezh (slated to replace SS-19 Stiletto missiles), and the Sarmat (AKA Son of Satan), intended to replace the SS-18 Satan heavy ICBMs.
  • Developing a rail-based ICBM type on top of the forementioned ICBM classes.
  • Developing a hypersonic missile that could carry nuclear warheads to any point on Earth in an hour and easily penetrate US missile defenses.

Note that the RS-24 (SS-29) Yars ICBMs will be able to carry 10 warheads each, whereas the missiles they’re replacing – the Topol (SS-25 Sickle) and Topol-M (SS-27 Sickle-B) – can carry only one warhead. Therefore, as these missiles enter service, the warhead carriage capacity of the Russian ICBM fleet will greatly increase beyond the (already huge) number of 1,684 warheads immediately deliverable to the CONUS.

By 2018, 80%, and by 2021, 100% of Russia’s ICBMs will be missiles of the new generation – the he Avangard/Rubezh, and the Sarmat heavy ICBM, as well as the forementioned rail-based ICBM.

By contrast, the US, under the Obama administration, has unilaterally retired and scrapped its nuclear-armed Tomahawk submarine-launched cruise missiles and their warheads, plans to kill the procurement of conventional Tomahawks, has no program to replace its ICBMs or air-launched cruise missiles, has delayed the induction of its next-generation bomber until the mid-2020s (and plans to procure only 80-100 of these crucial aircraft), has no plans to develop or deploy mobile ICBMs or medium- or short-range ballistic missiles, and has delayed its ballistic missile submarine replacement program. And even when these boats enter service, there will be only 12 of them, each carrying 16 missiles as opposed to the current Ohio class carrying 24 missiles each.

This is as simple as “Russia and China have nuclear-armed submarine- and ground-launched cruise missiles and IRBMs, the US does not.”

Which means that, even without further cuts, the US will be at a nuclear disadvantage vis-a-vis Russia (and China).

Russia would’ve been a huge nuclear threat necessitating the maintenance of the US nuclear arsenal at no less than its current size even WITHOUT this nuclear buildup. With it, it is becoming an even greater nuclear threat, thus necessitating that the US nuclear arsenal be increased, too.

This isn’t just Zbigniew Mazurak speaking; this is the State Department (through its diplomats in Moscow) and the Strategic Command’s leader, Adm. Haney (who is in charge of all US nuclear weapons), speaking. As Bill Gertz of the Washington Free Beacon reports:

“The blunt comments [by Adm. Haney - ZM] came in response to reports that Russian strategic nuclear forces recently held a large-scale nuclear exercise coinciding with saber-rattling conventional military deployments close to Russia’s eastern border with Ukraine.

Haney said the Russians conduct periodic nuclear war games and in 2013 produced a YouTube video that highlighted “every aspect of their capability.” (…)

State Department cables sent to Washington earlier this year included dire warnings that Russia is vastly increasing its nuclear arsenal under policies similar to those Moscow followed during the Soviet era. The cables, according to officials familiar with them, also stated that the Russian strategic nuclear forces buildup appears aimed at achieving nuclear superiority over the United States and not nuclear parity.

The nuclear modernization has been “continuous” and includes adding fixed intercontinental ballistic missiles (ICBMs) and mobile ICBMs, along with a new class of strategic missile submarines, Haney said in testimony.

“Russia has articulated their value in having strategic capability, and as such, each area they have invested in both in terms of nuclear strategic capability as well as space capability and cyberspace capability in terms of things,” Haney said.

“And as a result, we have seen them demonstrate their capability through a variety of exercises and operations. They maintain their readiness of that capability on a continuous fashion. And it’s a capability I don’t see them backing away from.”

By contrast, Haney testified to the committee that U.S. nuclear forces are in urgent need of modernization to update aging nuclear weapons, delivery systems, and support and production infrastructure, most of which were made decades ago. Under budget sequestration, which could be re-imposed in 2016, U.S. nuclear force modernization will be undermined.”

These facts utterly refute any claims – including those of Barack Obama, Congressional Democrats, and other nuclear disarmament advocates like the Arms Control Association and the Ploughshares Fund – that the US has too many warheads and can afford to cut its nuclear arsenal safely, or that this arsenal is a “Cold War relic” cutting which is “overdue and in the national interest.”

These despicable traitors wanted – and still want – America to cut its nuclear arsenal further and unilaterally, without Russian reciprocation. And for that, they should be severely punished with the maximum penalty foreseen by law for treason.

They have been blatantly lying. All of their claims, without any exception, are blatant lies. No, the US nuclear is not “too large”, “ripe for cuts”, nor a “Cold War relic.” No, its mission is not obsolete by any means – on the contrary, its mission (nuclear deterrence) is more important now than ever. No, cutting the US nuclear arsenal is not “overdue” nor “in the national interest” – it would be completely AGAINST the US national interest and utterly suicidal. It would invoke a Russian nuclear first strike on the US.

No, America cannot afford to cut its nuclear arsenal ANY FURTHER. It should increase, not cut, her nuclear arsenal.

Specifically, the US must:

  • Not enter into any more arms reduction agreements ever again, especially not with countries which routinely violate such treaties, like Russia.
  • Not reduce its nuclear arsenal by even one warhead and not retire any warheads except those whose service lives cannot be extended.
  • Begin quickly increasing its arsenal and the production of cheap, simple plutonium-based warheads. Ample plutonium for their production can be easily obtained from spent fuel from American nuclear reactors.
  • Resume nuclear testing.
  • Accelerate the development of the Long-Range Strike Bomber and procure 200, not 80-100, of these aircraft; and require that they be certified as nuclear-capable from the moment they enter service.
  • Quickly begin developing and procuring new, longer-ranged, stealthy replacements for the USAF’s cruise missiles as well as the Navy’s Tomahawk. The new cruise missiles should be of the same type, launchable from a wide range of platforms, and capable of delivering nuclear and conventional warheads. Their range should be at least 2,000 kms.
  • Accelerate the development of hypersonic weapons. The B-52, the B-1, and the B-2 should all be made capable of launching hypersonic missiles. The HTV and Blackswift programs should also be resumed.
  • Accelerate the Ohio class replacement program.
  • Develop and deploy a new ICBM for the USAF, which should come in rail- and silo-based variants.
  • Build more tactical nuclear warheads to reassure US allies around the world.


The opinions expressed by Ziggy’s Defense Blog do not necessarily reflect those of Reagangirl.com.


What does the Endangered Species Act Really Protect?

April 5, 2014

Meet three species still struggling despite the Endangered Species Act

By   /   April 4, 2014

Posted by Travis Perry of Kansas Watchdog.org and reposted with permission by Reagangirl.com April 5, 2014

OSAWATOMIE, Kan. — There’s no doubt about it, the Endangered Species Act is the kind of fuzzy, feel-good legislation that most people can back in theory. After all, who doesn’t like the idea of protecting Mother Nature?

But in practice, steps taken to protect flora and fauna often pit folks against one another. The battle usually comes down to protecting people versus plants and animals.

But a quick look at the ESA’s success rate sheds light on reasons for the opposition. In the Wall Street Journal in December, Damien Schiff and Julie MacDonald opined on the ESA’s recovery statistics:

A law intended to conserve species and habitat has brought about the recovery of only a fraction —less than 2% — of the approximately 2,100 species listed as endangered or threatened since 1973. Meanwhile, the law has endangered the economic health of many communities—while creating a cottage industry of litigation that does more to enrich environmental activist groups than benefit the environment.

Though the debate has been recently revived in Kansas because of the recent “threatened” listing of the lesser prairie-chicken, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service lists at least 18 threatened or endangered species that live in or cross through the Sunflower State. And at least three of them have seen mixed results after being brought under federal protection.

American Burying Beetle

The American Burying Beetle (Nicrophorus americanus)

The American Burying Beetle (Nicrophorus americanus)

A carnivorous bug that has been listed as “endangered” since 1989, the American Burying Beetle can be found in Chautauqua, Elk, Labette, Montgomery and Wilson counties in Kansas. A five-year review released by USFWS in 2008 admits that despite the insect’s protected status, a number of factors surrounding its conservation are foggy.

“The biological and ecological factors that are sustaining ABB populations in different locations within the species range, and the threats to those factors, remain poorly understood for most occurrences,” USFWS reported.

Aside from human encroachment, conservationist’s best guess is that population numbers are also partially affected by the availability of animal carcasses, on which the beetle feeds and breeds.

The last beetle population study in Kansas took place in 2001, and so far all known occurrences have been on private land.

“The USFWS lacks reliable data to indicate whether the habitat base is stable within the four-county area of the occurrence,” the report stated.

Whooping Crane

The Whooping Crane (Grus Americana)

The Whooping Crane (Grus Americana)

Without a doubt, the Grus Americanabetter known as the Whooping Crane, is the poster child for environmental protection. Sadly, its population figures haven’t reflected the sheer amount of effort that has been poured into conservation of the species.

Figures dating back to 1949 pin the wild population as low as 15 birds. The crane was listed as “endangered” in 1967, and in 2010 the number of wild birds was pegged at just shy of 400. While it’s an impressive comeback, it’s still far from where it needs to be.

Human population growth and environmental factors, such as extreme droughts and blizzards, have hurt the Whooping Crane’s recovery. USFWS estimates it would take as many as 1,000 birds to avoid genetic degradation of the species.

According to a 2009 report, the federal government planned to spend upward of $15.7 million between then and now to promote recovery of the crane. However, USFWS said at the time it would ideally need an additional $41.7 million to purchase easements for 40,000 acres of winter habitat and buffer zones, among other initiatives.

But even with such an extreme focus, the future is bleak. At best, the population might recover by 2035.

“Given the many threats to breeding, migration and wintering habitat, it is unlikely the whooping crane will ever become abundant,” USFWS wrote in a 2007 international recovery plan for the crane.

Mead’s Milkweed

Mead's Milkweed (Asclepia Meadii)

Mead’s Milkweed (Asclepia Meadii)

While species conservation usually conjures images of furry woodland creatures, plant life are also among those under federal protection. Mead’s Milkweed has been listed as “threatened” since 1988 due to habitat destruction, the advancement of invasive species consumption by weevils, deer and cattle, just to name a few factors.

But there’s a kicker: The feds aren’t really even sure if things are getting better.

“Current monitoring data is not sufficient to determine whether populations have been stable or increasing for 15 years,” USFWS wrote in a five-year review released in November.

But that didn’t stop them from making dire predictions.

“Based on the continuing threats, and the lack of recovery of viable populations, this species may become endangered in the foreseeable future throughout all or significant portions of its range,” the report stated.

Related: Trouble on the prairie: Feds call chicken ‘threatened,’ but what about the residents?
Related: Chicken conservation plan likened to mafia extortion

Contact Travis Perry at travis@kansaswatchdog.org, or follow him on Twitter at@muckraker62. Like Watchdog.org? Click HERE to get breaking news alerts in YOUR state!

Posted by Travis Perry of Kansas Watchdog and reposted with permission by Reagangirl.com April 5, 2014


Colonel Traynor Recalls the Operation Babylift C-5A Galaxy Crash

April 4, 2014

This true account given by Col. Dennis “Bud” Traynor was posted by him on April 4, 2014, 39 years to the day of the tragic crash of a USAF C-5A Galaxy occurred outside of Saigon during the initial stages of Operation Babylift. Operation Babylift was the effort by thousands of volunteers from civilian agencies, Catholic Services, Holt International, and of course the United States Air force and and other military operatives, to take endangered orphans out of Saigon prior to the Communist invasion, and put them into the safety of loving homes across the world.

Colonel Dennis “Bud” Traynor (USAF Ret.)

Thirty-nine years ago today, history was forever changed for you and for me. North Vietnamese soldiers were within miles of Saigon, poised for the inevitable capture of the city. There was great fear and trepidation on the part of the many who had opposed the Northern regime. Soldiers, airmen, and families were desperate to escape by any means possible.

Earlier that day, I was advised that despite the C-5 being a large-target risk, I would be taking my large load of howitzers directly into Saigon – unusual for the C-5 in those days since the introduction of the hand-held SA-7 shoulder-fired missile. 
An hour or so later, I was further advised that I was to take out of Saigon as many evacuees as possible – floor-loading all that would fit. 

Some of you were prepped to be evacuated and delivered to my aircraft that day.

[Ramp inside aircraft] While this return mission was anything but routine, the takeoff and departure was. However, twelve minutes after takeoff, uneven loading on the ramp locks on the right side of the aircraft, caused them to fail – under the load of pressurization – with catastrophic consequences.

[Drawing of ramp] When the ramp locks failed on the right side of the aircraft, the forward edge of the ramp entered the slipstream which in-turn split the pressure door top to bottom. The resulting departure of the pressure door cut all of the flight control cables to the tail and bled dry two of the four hydraulic systems.

[Route of flight] The rapid decompression was at 23,000 feet. 
A side note: This isn’t terribly high in terms of being able to breath. At that altitude, a person would still have about half the oxygen present at sea level. Nevertheless, while mountain climbers have summited Everest (~29,000) without supplemental oxygen, to be sure, after 5 or 6 minutes, you and I, who haven’t trained to work in thin air, would be MUCH more comfortable and clear-headed breathing supplemental oxygen. And of course, the RD itself could cut useful thinking time in half. But I digress.

[Search pattern] In keeping with all the coverage of the Malaysian Flight 370 search efforts, I thought some of you might find interesting the efforts that were made to find the “black box” from the C-5 that ejected itself in response to the shock of the ramp and pressure door ripping out the back of the aircraft.

[Salvaged ramp] The rear ramp and black box were recovered and the ramp was reassembled during the ensuing investigation to determine what caused the doors to blow out. ~Captain Bud Traynor

The C-5A Galaxy clipped a tree and what would have been a soft landing in a rice paddy outside of Saigon because a crash landing which caused the airplane to disintegrate upon impact. Because Captain Traynor was able to nurse the disabled plane to a landing position, despite the mishap, hundreds of lives of orphans, crew, and volunteers were saved which would have otherwise been lost on April 4, 1975.  Approximately 140 people died in the crash including 78 Vietnamese orphans. Hundreds lived, however, many of whom gather yearly to memorialize their friends and the babies lost and to commemorate the largest humanitarian airlift in history, Operation Babylift.

See the complete account by Colonel Traynor in “Airlift Tanker Quarterly”

Saving the Vietnamese Orphans” is the true story of Operation Babylift written in a moving children’s book and can be purchased through all online book sellers.

posted by Marjorie Haun  4/4/14



Close Encounters of the Irritating Kind

April 4, 2014

This rant comes from the sweat-soaked horror in which I awoke the other night upon realizing that one of the best movies of my young adulthood was responsible for the destruction of the American family and the emasculation of two generations of men.


Don’t be deceived by the title of this post. No, it’s not about encountering Liberals at commie pinko coffee shops and having to hear them rave about how Joe Biden is a statesman of great stature. No, it’s not about encountering self-loathing Atheist trolls on Twitter. No, it’s not about encountering young liberal parents who let their toddlers run amok in a restaurant because they believe they should “chose their own way.” This rant comes from the sweat-soaked horror in which I awoke the other night upon realizing that one of the best movies of my young adulthood was responsible for the destruction of the American family and the emasculation of two generations of men. That subversive, toxic flick is Close Encounters of the Third Kind.

During that chilling dip in my stream of consciousness, I wondered to myself if Steven Spielberg realized that when he wrote and directed Close Encounters that he would be giving middle-class American guys carte blanche to abandon their roles as husbands and dads when the wives and kids get annoying and run away with the spaghetti-necked aliens. The central character, Roy Neary–played by Hollywood progressive, Richard Dreyfuss–is a stressed-out working hack married to Ronnie Neary, played by the bouncy Teri Garr, who has some close encounters with strange atmospheric phenomena, and sets out on a journey to understand why a tree stump-shaped something or other captures his imagination. Strange manifestations, and weird lights, and impressions of tree stumps in mashed potato mounds grip him in an obsessed mania as his wife and three kiddos slowly fall apart, wanting Roy’s attention but getting only his increasingly preoccupied and irritable rebuffs.

You guys have all seen this movie–which at one time seemed to me a clever and human science fiction romp–so I don’t want to parse the entire plot. Suffice it to say that Neary, played comically and sympathetically by Dreyfuss, melts down in his own home and walks out on his family so he can slip the chains of fatherly responsibility, flee to Wyoming, hook up with another woman, and join the Jiminy Cricket space and time-traveling aliens in the shadow of the gigantic tree-stumpy volcanic mountain and leave forever his burden of suburban angst. You got it! Men across the world were handed justification to leave their naggy wives and whiney kids if they felt “called” by something other-worldly such as a giant tree stump in Wyoming, or a supernatural stirring in their pants.

Although, by that time, children, families, marriage, and fathers were already under attack by pop culture and lawmakers, divorce rates in 1977-78 were 700% of what they were a century earlier. Spielberg and Dreyfuss may not have been responsible for the decline in esteem for husbands and fathers as providers and protectors, but Close Encounters of the Third Kind painted an American man who abdicated his responsibilities as a hero whose wife and children deserved abandonment because they were demanding and irritating.

That’s what got stuck in my craw and interrupted my otherwise peaceful night. I was deceived by this movie. We were ALL deceived. And you, like I, probably remember the clapping and soft cheers which arose from cinema audiences the moment Richard Dreyfuss walked out of his chaotic house, got in a car, and left his irritating wife and kids to satisfy his vague compulsions and absurd spacerific wanderlust.

Well, there you have it. Happy dreams.

by Marjorie Haun  4/4/2014


Vietnam War Remembered: My Fallen Brother

April 3, 2014

2014 marks the 50th Anniversary of America’s official entry into the Vietnam War. This month, April 2014, marks the 39th Anniversary of our final evacuation from Southeast Asia. A growing wave of belated support and appreciation for our brothers who fought in Vietnam, then returned home to abuse, indifference, and decades of resentment, is sweeping the country as Americans acknowledge the extent of their sacrifice, and the courage with which they have borne their wounds for all these years. I lost my oldest brother in Vietnam, but those who came home are my brothers as well.

This article was originally published on May 28, 2013

I refuse to sit by and let my brothers who served in Vietnam go a minute longer without due tribute to their willingness to fight for their country to stop spread of Communism into Southeast Asia and preserve the worthy ideal of liberty for all.


Frederick “Donny” Snyder aboard the USS Towers c. 1969

Frederick Don Snyder was killed on May 17, 1970.  He was the machine gunner perched on top of the second of three swift boats patrolling the Dam Doi river in the marshy deltas of South Vietnam, just miles inland from the South China Sea. The first boat in the patrol came under fire by the Viet Cong who were hidden in the jungle thickets along the banks of the river. Don immediately took his position and fired on the Viet Cong.  In the ensuing firefight, Don was able to give sufficient cover to the first boat to allow its escape. Don sustained wounds from shrapnel throughout his torso. His lungs were hit, and he died in a military hospital the next day. He was 22.

I was a eight, just a few months shy of nine at the time my oldest brother was killed and my parents’ hearts were intractably broken.  I am the youngest of their seven children, my only sister was the oldest, with five  brothers in-between. Don was born on my sister’s first birthday, March 6, 1948. We were the classic boomer family with our births covering the years from post WWII, to the early sixties, the space age, and the decade of Vietnam.

Perhaps it is due to of the loss of my brother when I was in such a tender stage of psychological development, or maybe it is because of my patriot heart–or both–that the guys who came home, our Vietnam veterans, are so special to me.  And I find particular satisfaction in defying and disproving the culture and media organs that have for decades mis-characterized them, slandered their efforts in Vietnam, and hidden their stories of heroism and compassion.

I refuse to sit by and let my brothers who served in Vietnam go a minute longer without due tribute to their willingness to fight for their country to stop spread of Communism into Southeast Asia and preserve the ideal cause of liberty for all.

I returned from a church service a couple of years ago when July fourth fell on a Sunday and wrote one of my first ReaganGirl.com posts called “The Acceptable Blood.” This is a quote from that early post:

I was moved and changed that day by the remarks of those so personally touched by war.  No earthly standard teaches more about the Savior of the World that the examples of those who have given all they have to the cause of freedom, which is His cause and is central to His eternal plan.

I came home with my children, put together a simple meal and we broke our fast after having gone without for breakfast and lunch.  My oldest daughter sat down and in her petulant and provocative way said, “So, why did Brother ***** spout off today about how great America is and all that?”  I told her to stop.  And I said, “Do not mock the blood sacrifices of those who have died to ensure that you can sit down to an abundant table, in a free land, to speak your mind, for good or ill.  Right now I will speak.”

I related to my children what had been taught at the pulpit earlier.  It took awhile because I had to pause often to staunch the overwhelming emotion within me.  But they listened, in riveted silence they listened.

“You see, the Lord Himself brought forth His gospel, which transcends the Law of Moses.  The first law was completed by the Savior’s atonement, and when He died upon the cross the need for blood sacrifice was fulfilled and would never be required again, save for the one type of blood sacrifice which remains acceptable to Jesus Christ.  It is not the sacrifice of a lamb without blemish.  It is the sacrifice of those who willingly pay their installments towards the cost of freedom.  The blood of patriots who are willing to lay down their lives in the name of individual liberty and in the defense of justice for all, is not just an acceptable sacrifice to the Lord, but it is the most holy of earthly gifts.”

“In the beauty of the lilies, Christ was born across the sea,

With a glory in His bosom that transfigures you and me.

As He died to make men holy, let us live to make men free,

While God is marching on…Glory Hallelujah!”

This is the simple tribute to my brothers who served in Vietnam, my friends who served during the Gulf War, my Fathers who served in Korea and WWII, and my Grandfathers who came before them. May the richest of Heavenly Father’s blessings fall upon my sons and daughters who now serve in Afghanistan and other regions of the world for the just cause of liberty and human dignity.  My heart is with you all on this Memorial Day, 2012.

Cincopa WordPress plugin

Please leave your comment!

By Marjorie Haun  4/3/14

Content Protected Using Blog Protector By: PcDrome.
WordPress SEO fine-tune by Meta SEO Pack from Poradnik Webmastera